Tuesday, August 25, 2015
Saturday, August 22, 2015
Thursday, August 20, 2015
Monday, August 17, 2015
|Two residents converse in the street outside their houses in Rovinj|
There is, however, a significant difference. Whereas the most heavily touristed areas of Venice are largely ghost towns when it comes to actual residents living there (a friend who lived off Campo San Vidal for a time said that, with the exception of an accountant who kept an office on the ground floor of one building nearby, no regular tenant or resident was ever to be seen), the narrow cobbled streets of Rovinj are still inhabited by locals.
Indeed, because space within the walled confines of old Rovinj was so scarce, the town still has almost none of the hidden gardens enclosed within what most tourists in Venice understandably assume to be neighborhoods of nothing but stone and architecture. And because Rovinj has no such hidden gardens or even courtyards among its dense tall old buildings, the domestic life of its residents spills out into the streets on hot nights--or doors and windows are left so wide open to passersby that it's sometimes hard to tell whether that charming interior that beckons you is a homey restaurant or simply someone's actual home.
I was reminded again of Rovinj today by the news that Venice's population has now dropped below 56,000 and I wondered--as I did when I was visiting Croatia--if, in spite of the masses of people crowding its waterfront ringing the old town, Rovinj could somehow hold onto its resident population, as Venice has been unable to do.
Other commitments--which, Venice-related as they are, may themselves perhaps be the subject of a future post--have kept me from this blog, and from finishing with what I wanted to post about Rovinj. But I hope to do so very soon, and then return full-time to my proper subject of Venice itself. My apologies in the mean time.
Wednesday, August 12, 2015
Because this is a blog whose focus is Venice, the title of this post emphasizes that connection. But as the 6th-century mosaics featured today make abundantly clear, the rich history of Poreč (or Parenzo in Italian) began long before it became the first Istrian city to join the Republic of San Marco in 1267.
Indeed, the area has been inhabited since prehistoric times, though it was Emperor Augustus who put the city on the map, and there are still Roman ruins to been seen around town. It was while the city was part of the Byzantine empire that the Euphrasian Basilica--the subject of all but one of the images above and below--came into being as we now know it. It was a rebuilding of a 4th century church upon a site which, to this day, also retains a floor mosaic from Roman times.
Poreč itself is actually the first stop made by the ferry from Venice that I mentioned in my previous post; the town of Rovinj (pictured in that previous post) is its second stop. There's more than one ferry company that makes these runs across the Adriatic during the warmer months of the year, but we took Venezia Lines (http://www.venezialines.it/schedules) and found the crew friendly and the ship comfortable. (In fact, we splurged a bit and for an extra 15 euro each sat in the large catamaran's upper salon, where the seats were more spacious and which included a few small club chairs around two tables--good for playing cards with kids--and banquette seating as well.)
The voyage from Venice (the San Basilio terminal at the end of the Zattere) to Poreč takes less than 3 hours (arriving at 9 pm), and it's not hard to imagine spending one night in Poreč , taking in its sights the next morning, then taking the bus (which costs just 36 kuna--less than 5 euro) to Rovinj. It's a pleasant, air-conditioned trip of less than one hour.
In sharp contrast to Venice, Poreč is a town whose points of interest can comfortably be seen in part of a day, and I found the Euphrasian Basilica alone--a UNESCO World Heritage Site (http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/809) and considered to contain "among the finest examples of Byzantine art in the world" according to Wikipedia--to be well worth a trip.
But our base for last week's trip was actually Rovinj, and it's to that old city of the old Venetian Republic that I'll turn my attention in the next post.
|One of the extremely rare depictions of a visibly pregnant Mary, at left (visiting with her sister Elizabeth)|
|A view of the basilica--whose exterior is also partly decorated with mosaics--from its lovely courtyard|
|A building with a pair of Venetian trefoil windows along one of the two axial roads laid out by the Romans|
Monday, August 10, 2015
|The basilica of St Euphemia and its campanile crown the old town of Rovinj|
Nowadays the two cities are linked by daily ferries, and a pleasant 3 to 3 1/2 hour voyage takes you from the end of Venice's Zattere to the port of Rovinj, beside its old town. The schedule of the ferries--which leave Rovinj at 7 am and leave Venice at 5:30 pm--are clearly oriented toward day-trippers from Croatia, intent on joining the 75% of visitors to Venice who stay no more than a few hours. In fact, because you arrive at Rovinj at 9 pm from Venice, and the next ferry leaves in the early morning, you might conceivably make a "night trip" and enjoy Rovinj's less expensive restaurants and bars, but a day trip proper is out of the question. In the next couple of posts though, I'll suggest that 2 nights in Rovinj (or the nearby port town of Porec, also served by ferries) for someone staying a longer time in Venice makes more sense than the more common jaunt of a few hours made by someone staying in Rovinj.
But having awakened this morning at 5 am to catch the boat back to Venice, I'll leave more on that for tomorrow.
Wednesday, August 5, 2015
It's an unsettling experience to be wandering around the island of San Giorgio Maggiore and to suddenly see, through a large doorway, a work of art you know to have been removed from the place over two centuries ago. It's a bit like seeing ghost, but there's nothing spectral or wavering or diminished about this phantasm. No, it's vivid and large as life--though not the thing itself.
For those who--like me before this lucky afternoon--haven't see the reproduction of Veronese's Marriage Feast of Cana in the setting of the the San Giorgio Maggiore refectory for which it was originally created, the following link provides an interesting account of the painting's history, its theft by Napoleon, and its virtual return in this detailed full-scale reproduction by Adam Lowe's Factum Arte: http://old.cini.it/uploads/box/2a493868a94e80a8774dc93cb2206264.pdf
For those who--also like me--didn't have the chance to see the multimedia work that director Peter Greenaway created around and quite literally on this facsimile during the 2009 Venice Biennale, there is now an almost 4 minute clip of it here: http://www.factum-arte.com/pag/102/Peter-Greenaway-on--br--Veronese-apos-s-Wedding-at-Cana. With the use of digital projections and music Greenaway makes Veronese's famous painting his own (as, in a much older analog media, Tiepolo also made Veronese his own), and in doing so, enables us to see the painting in entirely new ways. It looks to have been a marvelous fantasia, which one can only hope might some day be staged again.